Commercial Division Blog: Current Developments in the Commercial Divisions of the New York State Courts

You searched for: "Breach of Contract"

Search Results

July 20, 2026 Court Holds Earnout Amount Cannot Be Negative Based On Extrinsic Evidence Of Contractual Intent, So Sellers Owed No Payment
On July 2, 2026, in Tromer v. PEAK6 Insurtech Holdings LLC, Index No. 653530/2023, Justice Andrew Borrok of the New York County Commercial Division granted plaintiff’s renewed motion for partial summary judgment, holding that the “Earnout Amount” under the parties’ Unit Purchase Agreement could not be a negative number and that the plaintiff therefore did not owe the defendant any negative earnout. The agreement provided that “in no event shall the Earnout Amount be less than zero dollars,” but the defendant counterclaimed that two components later added to the formula could drive the Earnout Amount below zero, entitling it to a payment from the sellers. In a prior order, the Court had denied summary judgment to both sides and permitted limited discovery of the transaction counsel who drafted the agreement as to the clause's meaning. Read More
July 13, 2026 Court Grants Summary Judgment Dismissing Counterclaims Where Extrinsic Evidence Confirmed Earnout Could Not Fall Below Zero
On July 2, 2026, in Tromer v. PEAK6 Insurtech Holdings LLC, Index No. 653530/2023, Justice Andrew Borrok granted plaintiff's renewed motion for partial summary judgment dismissing two of defendant's counterclaims. Read More
July 10, 2026 Court Denies Leave To Amend To Add RICO Claims, Finding Allegations Of Fraud And Breach Of Contract Cannot Be Recast As Racketeering
On May 11, 2026, in Jennie Enterprise, et al., v. Michael Shvo, et al., Index No. 653221/2024, Justice Andrea Masley denied plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a second amended complaint adding causes of action for civil RICO violations, RICO conspiracy, fraudulent inducement, aiding and abetting fraudulent inducement, and breach of contract. Read More
July 8, 2026 Court Grants Reargument And Vacates Foreclosure Order, Holding That Deed In Lieu Of Foreclosure Must Be Treated As A Mortgage Under Real Property Law § 320
On June 13, 2026, in Shanghai Commercial Bank Ltd., et al., v. New Tent, LLC, et al., Index No. 850240/2024, Justice Andrea Masley granted defendants’ motion for reargument, vacated the court’s prior summary judgment order, and ruled that the deed in lieu of foreclosure executed under the parties’ Forbearance Agreement must be treated as a mortgage under Real Property Law (“RPL”) § 320, requiring plaintiffs to proceed by foreclosure and sale. Read More
July 6, 2026 Court Holds That Bank’s Threats To Withhold Funding And Commence Foreclosure Cannot Support Economic Duress To Invalidate Forbearance Agreement
On May 21, 2026, in New Tent, LLC, et al, v. Shanghai Commercial Bank Ltd., et al., Index No. 659251/2024, Justice Andrea Masley granted banks’ motions to dismiss claims that their threats to withhold funding and commence foreclosure created economic duress that should invalidate a forbearance agreement. Read More
June 19, 2026 Court Grants Summary Judgment To Aviation Insurers Because War Perils Exclusion Bars Coverage For Aircraft Stranded In Russia Written by: Samuel L. Butt, Channing J. Turner, Ian Weiss, Thomas A. Kissane
On May 13, 2026, in Aircastle Ltd. v. Chubb European Group S.E., Index No. 654131/2022, Justice Joel M. Cohen granted defendants' motions for summary judgment. Read More
June 10, 2026 Court Grants Summary Judgment In Lieu Of Complaint Where Borrower Failed To Pay Origination Fees Required To Trigger Maturity Date Extensions Written by: Samuel L. Butt, Channing J. Turner, Ian Weiss, Thomas A. Kissane
On April 10, 2026, in I.B.I Volcano Investments LLC v. Apex South Creek IB, LLC, Index No. 655364/2025, Justice Melissa A. Crane of the New York County Commercial Division granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint. Read More
May 29, 2026 Court Holds Percentage-Based Attorneys’ Fees Stacked Across Merchant Cash Advance Agreement And Settlement Stipulation Unconscionable Written by: Samuel L. Butt, Ian Weiss, Thomas A. Kissane, Channing J. Turner
On May 5, 2026, in Samson MCA LLC v. DI Construction. LLC, Index No. E2024019427, Justice Daniel J. Doyle denied plaintiff’s motion under CPLR 3215(i) for entry of a default judgment and refused to enforce the parties’ stipulation of settlement. Plaintiff, a merchant cash advance funder, had purchased defendants’ future receivables under an agreement providing for attorneys’ fees calculated at 30% of the unremitted purchased amount. After defendants allegedly defaulted, the parties entered into a stipulation of settlement that incorporated those fees into the settlement balance and separately provided for an additional 25% in attorneys’ fees on the unpaid indebtedness in the event of a further default. The Court held that the stacked percentage-based attorneys’ fees provisions in both the underlying agreement and the settlement stipulation were procedurally and substantively unconscionable, and refused to enforce them. In denying the motion, the Court explained: Read More
May 6, 2026 Dispute Over Interest Calculations Insufficient To Avoid Summary Judgment When Resolved By Reference To Contract Written by: Channing J. Turner, Ian Weiss, Thomas A. Kissane, Samuel L. Butt
On March 24, 2026, Justice Andrew Borrok rejected defendant’s attempt to create a material issue of fact by reference to a dispute about the calculation of interest, where that subject was addressed in the parties’ contract. The case is Big Bus Tours Limited v. Twin America, LLC, Index No. 654028/2025. Read More
May 4, 2026 Subsequent Agreement Does Not Prevent Application Of CPLR 3213 To Settlement Agreement Written by: Thomas A. Kissane, Ian Weiss, Samuel L. Butt, Channing J. Turner
On March 10, 2026, Justice Melissa A. Crane granted summary judgment on a settlement agreement under CPLR 3213. The case is G.O.C. Investments Companies Inc. v. BSD Tree, Inc., Index No. 656001/2025. Read More
April 27, 2026 Claim Against Financial Advisor Survives Summary Judgment Based On Evidence Its Services Were “So Incompetent” They Were “Worse Than No Services At All” Written by: Ian Weiss, Thomas A. Kissane, Samuel L. Butt, Channing J. Turner
On March 31, 2026, in Guggenheim Securities, LLC v. Falcon’s Beyond Global, LLC, et al., Index No. 651585/2024, Justice Melissa A. Crane granted in part and denied in part dueling motions for summary judgment. The court dismissed the defendant’s counterclaims against its financial advisor for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and equitable rescission, but denied both parties’ motions for summary judgment on their breach of contract claims. The Court explained: Read More
April 6, 2026 Preliminary Injunction Enforcing Restrictive Covenants Granted
On March 2, 2026, Justice Andrew Borrok granted a preliminary injunction enforcing non-compete and non-solicitation restrictive covenants in plaintiff’s operating agreement against a member, Shravan Reddy, and his co-defendant company, AplihsMD. The case is Excelusmle Review LLC v. Reddy, Shravan, Index No. 654449/2025. Read More
March 18, 2026 Court Rejects Ratification And Estoppel Defenses Based On No-Waiver Provision In Agreement
On January 13, 2026, Justice Andrea Masley denied summary judgment to defendants asserting ratification and estoppel defenses against claims for breach of contract in connection with collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) based on a broad no-waiver provision in an agreement. In CWCapital Cobalt VR Ltd. v. CWCapital Investments LLC, et al., Index No. 653277/2018, the issuer plaintiff asserted claims for breach of contract, among others, against the manager and servicer of the CDOs. In response, the defendants sought to dismiss the case based on the fact that they had managed the CDOs the same way for a decade before the action without complaint from the plaintiff and that an officer of the plaintiff had certified annually that no defaults were found. The Court rejected these facts as a basis for ratification and estoppel. It explained: Read More
March 16, 2026 Court Declines To Find Disclosure Of A “Clients/Prospects” List Is An Automatic Breach Of Confidentiality Agreement Between Company And Its Ex-President
On January 9, 2026, Justice Andrea Masley denied a motion brought by a company against its former president seeking summary judgment for breach of an employment agreement that contained confidentiality clauses despite evidence that the ex-president had passed lists of accounts and “clients/prospects” to potential new employers. In Frosch International Travel, Inc. v. Michel Botbol, Index No. 653071, the Court acknowledged several e-mails in which the ex-president passed lists of accounts and clients to two potential employers, and it noted that the lists did appear to contain at least some of the company’s customers. However, the Court found that questions of material fact still existed as to whether the information in the lists was truly confidential company information. It explained: Read More
February 18, 2026 Court Finds Faithless Servant Defense Precludes Executive From Recovering Equity Grants Under Warrant Agreement
On February 5, 2026, Justice Joel M. Cohen issued a decision after non-jury trial that found, among other things, that an executive’s “effective abandonment” of his responsibilities to the company breached an employment agreement and gave rise to an “independent faithless servant defense” that precluded him from recovering equity grants. In Thomas O’Connor, et al., v. Society Pass Incorporated, Index No. 656938/2019, the plaintiff entered into an employment agreement to serve as Chief Marketing Officer, a role that included responsibility for securing additional investments and clients for the company. After falling out with the company’s then-CEO, plaintiff took unauthorized, months-long vacations and disparaged the CEO to potential investors. Read More
February 11, 2026 Motion To Dismiss Denied As To Contract Claim, Granted As To Quantum Meruit Written by: Samuel L. Butt, Thomas A. Kissane, Channing J. Turner, Joshua Wurtzel
On November 24, 2025, Justice Andrew Borrok sustained plaintiff’s claim for breach of contract, while dismissing its claim for quantum meruit as duplicative. The case is Torreya Partners LLC v. Sandoz Inc., Index No. 653040/2025. Read More
January 14, 2026 Summary Judgment Granted Where Defendant Failed To Raise Triable Issues Regarding Its Obligation Under Promissory Notes Written by: Joshua Wurtzel, Channing J. Turner, Samuel L. Butt, Thomas A. Kissane
On November 21, 2025, Justice Andrew Borrok granted a plaintiff lender summary judgment, finding that defendant failed to raise any triable issue concerning its obligations under certain promissory notes. The case is Mendon Ventures Banktech Fund I LP v. Equitus Corporation, Index No. 654629/2024. Read More
December 15, 2025 Motion To Dismiss Claims Asserting Breach Of Letter Agreement Denied Written by: Joshua Wurtzel, Jeffrey M. Eilender, Samuel L. Butt, Channing J. Turner, Thomas A. Kissane
On November 3, 2025, Justice Joel M. Cohen denied a motion to dismiss claims alleging violation of a letter agreement that the parties had agreed to work toward modifying. The case is Weinberg v. Meridian Capital Group, LLC, Index No. 653283/2025. Read More
November 5, 2025 Defendant’s Claim That Plaintiff Failed To Mitigate Damages Did Not Preclude Summary Judgment In Lieu of Complaint Written by: Jeffrey M. Eilender, Joshua Wurtzel, Channing J. Turner, Thomas A. Kissane, Samuel L. Butt
On October 3, 2025, in Phillips Auctioneers LLC v. Mimran, Index No. 653994/2025, Justice Melissa A. Crane granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint. Plaintiff and defendant entered into a third-party guarantee pertaining to a Jackson Pollock work pursuant to which defendant was required to purchase the work for $14.5 million if certain conditions of sale were not met.. The conditions of sale were not met and Mimran failed to pay for the work. The Court explained: Read More
October 24, 2025 Court Grants Summary Judgment To Landlord On Breach Of Lease But Denies Consequential Damages Written by: Jeffrey M. Eilender, Joshua Wurtzel, Samuel L. Butt, Channing J. Turner, Thomas A. Kissane
On September 10, 2025, Justice Andrea Masley granted summary judgment to the plaintiff landlord on liability, and awarded attorneys’ fees under a lease, while granting summary judgment to defendant tenants to the extent of striking the landlord’s claim for consequential damages. The case is 1101-43 Ave Acquisition LLC v. Sonder Hospitality USA Inc., Index No. 653840/2020. Read More

Load More