Blogs

Posts Categorized: Summary Judgment

Posted: September 19, 2018

Court Grants Adverse Inference on Summary Judgment for Assertion of Fifth Amendment Rights

On September 5, 2018, Justice Bransten of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Knox, LLC v. Lakian, 2018 NY Slip Op. 32191(U), granting an adverse inference against a party that asserted its Fifth Amendment rights, explaining: Plaintiffs also ask this Court to draw a negative inference against Mr, Lakian. During Mr. Lakian’s deposition… Read more »

Posted: August 28, 2018

Defendant Cannot Delay Summary Judgment to Obtain More Discovery Without Showing That Relevant Evidence is in Plaintiff’s Exclusive Possession

On August 1, 2018, Justice Platkin of the Albany County Commercial Division issued a decision in Horvath v. High Peaks Sand, Gravel & Mins., LLC, 2018 NY Slip Op. 51214(U), denying a request to delay summary judgment to allow the defendant to take more discovery because the defendant had not showed that relevant evidence was… Read more »

Posted: August 11, 2018

Court Reviews Law Governing Contract Interpretation on Summary Judgment

On August 6, 2018, Justice Schecter of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Cast Iron Co., LLC v. Cast Iron Corp., 2018 NY Slip Op. 31881(U), discussing contract interpretation on a summary judgment motion: Contracts are construed in accord with the parties’ intent, the best evidence of which is the language… Read more »

Posted: July 31, 2018

Court Erred in Granting Summary Judgment on Dismissing Plaintiff’s Claims Where Defendant Only Moved for Judgment on its Counterclaims

On July 25, 2018, the Second Department issued a decision in Philogene v. Duckett, 2018 NY Slip Op. 05507, holding that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s claims when the defendant had only moved for judgment on its counterclaims, explaining: On a motion for summary judgment, the court is limited… Read more »

Posted: May 23, 2018

Summary Judgment Inappropriate Where Conflicting Inferences Can be Drawn from Evidence and Issues of Credibility Exist

On May 16, 2018, the Second Department issued a decision in UB Distributors, LLC v. S.K.I. Wholesale Beer Corp., 2018 NY Slip Op. 03559, holding that summary judgment is inappropriate where conflicting inferences can be drawn from the evidence and issues of credibility exist, explaining: Here, the defendants failed to establish their prima facie entitlement… Read more »

Posted: May 15, 2018

Invoking CPLR 3212 and Commercial Division Rule 9, Justice Scarpulla Conducts Immediate Hearing to Resolve Factual Dispute

On May 2, 2018, Justice Scarpulla of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Overtime Partners, Inc. v. 320 W. 31st Assoc., LLC, 2018 NY Slip Op. 30807(U), invoking CPLR 3212 and Commercial Division Rule 9 in conducting an immediate hearing on the only factual issue in dispute in an action for,… Read more »

Posted: March 25, 2018

Plaintiff Not Entitled to Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint Because Condition Precedent For Suing on Note Not Met

On March 16, 2018, the Fourth Department issued a decision in Hogan v. Iskalo Off. Holdings III LLC, 2018 NY Slip Op. 01715, holding that a plaintiff was not entitled to summary judgment in lieu of complaint because a condition precedent for suing on a note had not been satisfied, explaining: To prevail on a… Read more »

Posted: February 11, 2018

Plaintiff Cannot Withstand Summary Judgment By Showing Question of Fact on One Element of Fraud Claim if it Fails on Another Element

On January 22, 2018, Justice Sherwood of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in xLon Beauty, LLC v. Day, 2018 NY Slip Op. 30142(U), holding that a plaintiff could not withstand summary judgment dismissing its fraud claim by showing that there was a question of fact regarding one element of the claim… Read more »

Posted: January 7, 2018

Summary Judgment Denied; Affidavit that Contradicts a Contemporaneous Document is Not a Sham Affidavit

On January 2, 2018, the First Department issued a decision in Kärst v. W.P. Carey Inc., 2018 NY Slip Op. 00003, holding that an affidavit that contradicted documentary evidence was not a sham affidavit, explaining: Ultimately, the parties dispute the purpose of the payments made between December 2013 and September 2014 and whether defendant did… Read more »