Commercial Division Blog

Current Developments in the Commercial Divisions of the
New York State Courts by Schlam Stone & Dolan LLP
Posted: January 12, 2017

Court Had Jurisdiction to Hear Motion for Time to Serve Despite Failure to Serve Within 120 Days

On January 10, 2017, the First Department issued a decision in Zegelstein v. Faust, 2017 NY Slip Op. 00132, holding that a trial court had jurisdiction to hear a motion for more time to serve and to amend, explaining:

The court erroneously concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain plaintiffs’ cross motion for leave to extend the time for service and to amend the complaint as a result of plaintiffs’ failure to serve the summons with notice within 120 days of commencement, in violation of CPLR 306-b. The court was required to exercise its discretion to decide whether an extension of time for service was warranted upon good cause shown or in the interest of justice.

View posts