Monthly Archives: January 2019

Posted: January 30, 2019

Court Imposes Constructive Trust Over Proceeds of Fraud

On January 10, 2019, Justice Ash of the Kings County Commercial Division issued a decision in Kliban v. Vishnev, 2019 NY Slip Op. 30150(U), imposing a constructive trust over the proceeds of a fraud, explaining: With regards to Plaintiffs claim for a constructive trust against Susanna, Atlantic Ocean, Kogan, and AGVD for the monies paid to them... Read more »

Posted: January 29, 2019

Party That Benefited from Agreement With Arbitration Provision Bound by That Provision

On January 18, 2019, Justice Schecter of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Petrides & Co. LLC v. Yorktown Partners LLC, 2019 NY Slip Op. 30157(U), holding that a party that benefits from a contract iwth an arbitration provision was bound by that provision even though he did not sign the contract,... Read more »

Posted: January 27, 2019

Transcripts and Videos of Arguments in the Court of Appeals for January 2019 Now Available

On December 28, 2018, we noted a case of interest from the oral arguments before the Court of Appeals in January 2019: Arrowhead Capital Finance, Ltd. v. Cheyne Specialty Finance Fund L.P. et al., APL-2018-00005 (argued Wednesday, January 9, 2019) (“Attorney and Client–Unauthorized Practice of Law–Whether failure of plaintiff’s counsel to maintain an in-state office... Read more »

Posted: January 26, 2019

Party Waived Right to Arbitrate By Suing Rather Than Moving to Compel Arbitration

On January 11, 2019, Justice Schecter of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in OCS Dev. Group, LLC v. Midtown Four Stones LLC, 2019 NY Slip Op. 30129(U), holding that the right to arbitrate was waived by beginning a lawsuit rather than moving to compel arbitration, explaining: At the outset, there is no contractual... Read more »

Posted: January 25, 2019

Disrespectful and Disproportionate Treatment of Female Shareholder Oppression Justifying Dissolution Under BCL

On January 9, 2019, Justice Nowak of the Erie County Commercial Division issued a decision in Matter of Straka v. Arcara Zucarelli Lenda & Assoc. CPAs P.C., 2019 NY Slip Op. 29017, holding that disrespectful and disproportionate treatment of a female shareholder was oppression sufficient to justify a corporation’s dissolution, explaining: A minority shareholder may petition... Read more »

Posted: January 24, 2019

Undertaking Related to Injunction Released Because There Was No Finding That Plaintiff Was Not Entitled to Injunction

On January 16, 2019, the Second Department issued a decision in Candlewood Holdings, Inc. v. Valle, 2019 NY Slip Op. 00255, holding that an undertaking related to an injunction should have been released because there was no finding that the plaintiff was not entitled to the injunction, explaining: Before the Supreme Court directed the entry of... Read more »

Posted: January 23, 2019

New York Choice of Law Provision Enforceable Even Though Contract Not Connected to New York

On January 9, 2019, Justice Scarpulla of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in ABB, Inc. v. Havtech, LLC, 2019 NY Slip Op. 30095(U), enforcing a New York choice of law provision even though the contract had no connection to New York, explaining: Havtech argues that the Agreement’s New York choice of law provision... Read more »

Posted: January 22, 2019

The VIX is Fixed?! Plaintiffs Would Like Some Discovery Real Quick

With apologies for the substandard rhyming in this title, this is a quick post to update you on the current status of the VIX Plaintiff’s motion for expedited discovery. On Friday January 11th, a minute entry on the docket showed that Plaintiff’s motion was denied, without prejudice, with an order with further court dates to... Read more »

Posted: January 22, 2019

Shareholder Fails to Meet Standard for Corporate Dissolution

On January 10, 2019, Justice Friedman of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Matter of Quazzo v. 9 Charlton St. Corp., 2019 NY Slip Op. 30098(U), holding that a shareholder had failed to meet the standard for corporate dissolution on summary judgment, explaining: Business Corporation Law § 1104-a (a) provides in pertinent... Read more »